The license: Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0 over MIT because of the explicit patent grant. If a contributor holds a patent that reads on the code they contributed, they grant you a license to it. MIT doesn't.
Not AGPL because AGPL would block the QuickBooks and Xero plugin Trojan horse — the whole point is shipping Bitcoin data into legacy accounting stacks that won't touch copyleft code.
Not Business Source License (BSL) because it undermines community trust. "Open source eventually" is not open source. We chose the license that the audience we want actually respects.